Titan Passwords provides password generation and financial security compliance guidance. Because our content directly references regulatory frameworks โ PCI-DSS v4.0, NIST SP 800-63B, FCA Operational Resilience, FFIEC Authentication Guidance, and others โ editorial rigour is not optional. This policy documents the processes we follow to ensure every piece of content meets the accuracy and transparency standards our users depend on.
1. Fact-Checking Process
Every factual claim about a compliance framework, technical standard, or regulatory requirement is verified against the primary source document before publication. Our fact-checking follows a three-step protocol:
- Locate the primary source: Each claim is traced to the authoritative document published by the issuing body โ PCI Security Standards Council, NIST, FCA, FFIEC, NCSC, or equivalent.
- Verify the specific requirement: The exact section, clause, or requirement number is cross-referenced. Where a requirement has changed between framework versions (e.g., PCI-DSS v3.2.1 to v4.0), the version-specific wording is confirmed.
- Cite the reference: All compliance claims in articles and tool panels include a direct citation to the source document with section or requirement identifiers.
Fact-checks are conducted by the site author, A Yousaf Tanoli, who has direct implementation experience with each of the referenced frameworks. Where a claim falls outside the author's direct expertise, external primary sources are consulted and noted.
2. Content Sourcing
Titan Passwords draws content from three categories of sources, each with its own handling requirements:
Framework documents published by PCI SSC, NIST, FCA, FFIEC, NCSC, ICO, and other official bodies. These form the evidentiary basis for all compliance claims. Always cited with document name, version, and section number.
Practitioner experience implementing controls in regulated environments. This informs explanatory content, practical guidance, and commentary. Clearly distinguished from regulatory requirements through phrasing (e.g., "in our experience" vs. "PCI-DSS v4.0 Requirement 8 requires").
Industry reports, academic research, and recognised security publications. Used for context, benchmarking, or illustrative purposes only โ never as the sole basis for a compliance claim. Always attributed.
Titan Passwords does not accept guest posts, sponsored content, or user-contributed articles. All content is written or reviewed directly by the site author.
3. Review Process
Before any content is published on Titan Passwords, it passes through the following review stages:
- Author draft: Content is written by A Yousaf Tanoli, incorporating primary source citations and practical implementation context.
- Technical accuracy check: Every compliance requirement, technical claim, and tool behaviour statement is verified against the current version of the cited framework.
- Tool cross-reference: Where content references the password generator's compliance panel, the live tool behaviour is tested to ensure the editorial claim matches the observable output.
- Clarity and disclaimer review: Content is reviewed to ensure it clearly distinguishes between regulatory requirements (mandatory), industry recommendations (advisory), and author opinion (interpretive).
- Publication: The author signs off on the final version. A publication date is recorded.
For significant content updates โ such as changes to referenced framework versions โ the full review process is repeated. For minor corrections (typographical errors, broken links), a streamlined check applies.
4. Update Policy
Titan Passwords content is maintained on an ongoing basis. Framework documents evolve, and our content must reflect the current state of each standard.
- Framework version updates: When a referenced framework publishes a new version (e.g., PCI-DSS v4.0.1, NIST SP 800-63B revision), we review and update affected content within 90 days. The update date is noted on the page.
- Tool compliance panel: The password generator's live compliance panel is updated concurrently with editorial content to ensure consistency.
- Routine reviews: All content is reviewed at least every 12 months for continued accuracy, even if no framework changes have occurred.
- Version labelling: Where specific framework version numbers are cited, we note the version and publication date of the cited document.
5. Corrections
Despite rigorous fact-checking, errors can occur. We have a clear process for correcting them โ and we treat corrections with the same seriousness as original publication.
How to report an error
If you identify an inaccuracy in any Titan Passwords content โ whether in a guide article, tool description, or compliance panel reference โ please email [email protected] with:
- The specific page URL and the claim you believe is inaccurate
- The correct information and your source (ideally a primary framework document)
- Your name and affiliation (optional, but helpful for follow-up)
Correction response
- We acknowledge receipt of error reports within 5 business days.
- Substantive corrections are investigated and resolved within 14 business days.
- If a correction is confirmed, the page is updated and a correction notice is added at the top of the affected content noting the date and nature of the correction.
- If the claim is found to be accurate after review, we respond with the supporting evidence.
- Material errors that could affect password security decisions are corrected immediately and notified via the site's correction log.
Correction log
Substantive corrections are recorded below. Minor edits (typography, formatting, broken links) are not logged.
No corrections logged as of 2 June 2026.
6. Author Expertise
All content on Titan Passwords is written by A Yousaf Tanoli, a hobbyist with a keen interest in password security and online safety implementing cybersecurity controls in regulated environments.
Led credential management and authentication programmes aligned with PCI-DSS v3.2.1 and v4.0 (Requirement 8) in Level 1 merchant environments.
Implemented Identity Assurance Level (IAL) and Authenticator Assurance Level (AAL) compliant authentication systems following NIST digital identity guidelines.
Prepared financial services firms for FCA Operational Resilience (PS21/3) assessments including access control and credential management requirements.
Applied FFIEC Authentication Guidance for layered security controls in retail banking and investment management environments.
Implemented logical access controls (CC6.1) for SOC 2 Type II audited organisations across multiple service categories.
Developed financial fraud prevention and account takeover response procedures for payment processing and online banking platforms.
The author's direct experience means that content on Titan Passwords is informed by practical implementation โ not theoretical or purely academic study. Where the author does not have direct implementation experience, this is disclosed and primary sources are relied upon exclusively.
7. Independence Statement
We make the following commitments to editorial independence:
- No sponsor influence: Compliance content, tool descriptions, and security recommendations are determined solely by the author's assessment of the primary sources. No sponsor, advertiser, or partner has input into editorial conclusions.
- No vendor preference: Where products, services, or tools are mentioned in content, they are selected based on the author's independent assessment and relevant regulatory recognition โ not commercial relationships.
- Transparent funding: Titan Passwords is funded by Kokal Operations Ltd. Any future monetisation (e.g., affiliate links) will be disclosed clearly and separately from editorial content. See our Affiliate Disclosure for details.
- No regulatory endorsement: Titan Passwords is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the PCI Security Standards Council, NIST, FCA, FFIEC, or any other standards body or regulator referenced in its content. All framework references are used for informational and compliance-guidance purposes only.
- Not regulated advice: Content on this site does not constitute regulated financial, legal, or compliance advice. Organisations should consult qualified compliance professionals for their specific regulatory obligations.